By
the Slimmest of Chances
I am fascinated in
history by obscure happenings that have major results. I have just finished
reading "The Man Who Broke Napoleon's Codes" by Mark Urban.
That man was George Scovell who spent the entire Peninsular War on Wellington's
Staff in a number of positions. He bought a lieutenant's commission
in the Cavalry to get on the staff and ended the war as a Lt. Colonel
commanding the Staff Cavalry which were used as spies, military police
and guides Scovell was a genius. He almost instantly broke the substitution
codes used between Napoleon's Marshals and after much brilliant work
broke the "gran chiffre" code used by Napoleon to communicate
with King Joseph and with his Marshals. This last fact was not well
known. It was very similar in fact to the British/US "Ultra"
secret in WWII.
After the war Scovell
initially fell on hard times. His total half-time army pay was 150 pounds
per annum. He wrote a letter to Wellington who was Commander-in-Chief
of the Army (Horse Guards) and shortly later Prime Minister asking for
any consideration Wellington could give him as either a military or
as a civil appointment. He never received an answer.
As history of the
Peninsular War began to be written Wellington made it very plain to
Charles Napier, the first complete historian of the conflict, that Scovell's
breaking of the minor codes could be included but that he had broken
the great cipher of Napoleon must be considered a secret. This was in
1820 or later - long after Waterloo. Wellington wanted to be the sole
"genius" of the war and did not want to have that image tarnished
by public knowledge that he knew most of the opposing armies moves before
they made them.
But Wellington tripped
up a bit. In one short dispatch from the Peninsula he had named Scovell
as the only one working on breaking the great cipher, and this provided
the clue that lead to Mark Urban's book. So Scovell gets the recognition
nearly two hundred years later due to one sentence in one dispatch from
Salamanca. I think that is neat.
|